THALES: Turning Empathy Into a Weapon, How Social Justice Fights Dirty

Social Justice is often driven through shame, through a certain desire to appear moral, righteous, and proper to others. If a truth is unpleasant, if it doesn’t sound good rhetorically, it must be dispensed with for sake of appearances, to avoid being publicly shamed as a bad person.

This is a concept I’ve long referred to as “Weaponized Empathy,” for this is a tactic that uses empathy as a political bludgeon to shame you into compliance with someone else’s agenda. The common pop-culture argument for why women “make 77 cents on the dollar” is that women are being discriminated against. Sexism, misogyny, et. al. If you suggest that women consciously and intentionally make different decisions, and tend to have a lower risk tolerance, it is considered anathema. Rather than investigate whether or not this claim has merit, the SJW rejects it as unpleasant.

Once labeled as unpleasant, it is permissible for the SJW to use Weaponized Empathy to silence debate. If you believe men and women have fundamental differences, you are a sexist. You hate women. You want to oppress women. You lack empathy, they claim.

Oddly enough, this argument doesn’t work on people who actually lack said empathy. If you asked a member of ISIS if he wanted to oppress women, he’d probably answer with “well yes, women need to be oppressed, obviously.” The argument only works on the good-natured person who is horrified at the implication that he might be a woman-oppressor.

Thus shamed, the target of Weaponized Empathy has a few choices. He can defend himself from the charge, but this is taken by SJWs as prima facie evidence of guilt. After all, why would you be defensive if you weren’t feeling guilty? Even if the defense is successful, the tactic has derailed the argument from the original point, and has shifted the direction of debate to your worthiness. No longer are you talking about a point-of-view about a particular problem, you are talking about whether or not you are guilty. This marks Weaponized Empathy as a cleverly-disguised Ad Hominem fallacy.

Another option is to dismiss and ridicule the accuser. This tactic can be very effective, and is frequently deployed by Donald Trump, among others. But it imposes a significant social and personal cost on the person who uses it. You have to be willing to accept that a large number of people are going to outright hate you, and are going to believe that you are guilty. You must also be supremely confident in the fact that you are not what they say you are. Self-doubt will rapidly destroy you.

Such a path is only useful to people in a very strong position financially, intellectually, emotionally, and morally. If you are poor, they will target your job. If you are wealthy, they will boycott your business. If you’ve ever said or done anything questionable, they’ll try to assassinate your character (sometimes they’ll make something up even if you haven’t).  If you are not supremely confident in yourself, they will break your sense of self-worth.

Anonymity is a good preemptive defense option for anyone who is missing some or all of those attributes. This is one reason Twitter’s Blue Checkmark brigade, among many others, has been pushing for forcing verification of some kind or another. Find someone who doesn’t believe in anonymity on the Internet, and the odds are very strong that the person is a Leftist, if not an outright SJW.

All of this is designed to shame you into compliance. Agree with X, or we’ll label you a racist/sexist/whateverphobe.

Weaponized Empathy is often deployed in subtle ways, too. One tactic is to take a very poignant picture, or to carefully choose from available pictures, in order to deliberately invoke an emotional response. After the Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman affair, the media chose a very tame, old, innocent-looking picture of Trayvon when he was much younger, and a much more threatening picture of Zimmerman. The choices were intentional. They wished to make you feel bad for Trayvon, and to hate Zimmerman, regardless of the facts of the case.

They also wished to create an implied position of shame. If you think the shooting was justified, you like little black kids to get murdered. It’s an implied variant of the “you want to push granny off a cliff” position. This sets the bar very high in any debate. Before you can even get to the facts of the case, you must prove a negative, namely that you don’t believe in those things. Otherwise the SJW is automatically right in all particulars because you are a bad person.

Furthermore, since you are a certified bad person, it is permissible to shame you, hate you, and attack you. Again, this really only works if you actually have empathy. If you genuinely did want little black kids to die, the response would be something along the lines of “yeah, so what?”

Where SJWs gain a little bit of wiggle room is by tacitly acknowledging their ownership of the Establishment. An SJW might suggest that you are a heartless bastard who wants to say that you want little black kids to get shot, but that you have refrained from doing so because you are afraid of losing your job, being ridiculed, etc…

In so doing he reveals that the Left truly dominates the cultural and political narratives of our time. It is a self-defeating argument. If there is a sort of systemic racism being pushed by a hostile cultural and political system, it is SJWs who created it, because they control it. It’s like when SJWs lament about an epidemic of rapes on college campuses. One of two things must be true: either they are lying and the rapes aren’t taking place, or they are telling the truth and a bastion of SJW culture is actually a bustling rape factory.

Either the systemic bigotry described by SJWs does not exist, or SJWs themselves are the purveyors of said systemic bigotry. Weaponized Empathy is designed to distract your attention from this, and shift the conversation to your worthiness to even engage the SJW in the first place.

The insidious thing about Weaponized Empathy is that it is usually deployed by those who don’t have empathy against those who do. It is the powerful man telling you he is powerless. It is the liar calling you dishonest. It is the narcissist accusing you of being self-centered. It is the tyrant accusing you of despotism.

In other words, it is pure projection. Do not fall victim to it.

Thales is a DJ, Byzantinist, sad puppy, and another defender of the West woken up by social justice idiocy.

Facebook Comments


  1. Mike Suhor

    December 20, 2017 at 2:09 pm

    Harvey Weinstein was the ultimate social Justice Warrior.

    Everything he said he was against he did.

    • Thales


      December 20, 2017 at 4:49 pm

      It is comical how many SJWs have been outed as atrocious human beings lately.

      • Marie

        December 20, 2017 at 8:40 pm

        Very true.

  2. Monky

    December 20, 2017 at 5:12 pm

    The entire social justice sphere has turned into abusive dogmatics, with no intellectual grounding.


    • Thales


      December 20, 2017 at 5:23 pm

      Which isn’t surprising, ultimately. Marxism, upon which Social Justice is based, is basically a prototype for abusive dogmatics.

  3. TSW

    December 20, 2017 at 8:56 pm

    Beautifully written.
    An addendum:
    Combatting SJWs with facts, logic and reason has proven to be pointless. They overtly reject facts and logic as ‘patriarchal’, ‘racist’ or simply illegitimate because they openly profess that feelings trump all data and/or rational thought.
    I think this is quite revealing.
    SJWs and Progressives in general use emotional factors as weapons. One must realize that the use of a tool with intent to commit harm implies that the user would consider the tool harmful TO THEIR OWN SELF; else, they would not be convinced of its lethality.
    Therefore: one must counter Progressive and SJW attacks with emotionally based attacks of one’s own.
    SJW – “You’re against a national health care system because you just want people to die, don’t you?”
    You – “You Bastard! You’re DELIBERATELY making Health Care unaffordable to everybody except the 1% because YOU ENJOY MURDERING BABIES! YOU BAASSTTAARRDD!!!”
    Alternative answer from you, using sarcasm & humor – “Yeah, and the fact that infant mortality rose and lifespans shrank for the first time in 100 years in America once Obamacare was instituted is ok with you, right? I mean, you consider that a FEATURE of obamacare, don’t ya? HAHAHAAAAAAA!”

    Again: facts, logic and reason not only don’t work, but are counterproductive. You can’t calmly and quietly use facts and reason to gently convince a 5 year old spoiled brat to stop screaming and have him eat dinner before he can have dessert. You can only put him in his room until he calms down, and if he doesn’t acquiesce, he goes without any dinner altogether.

    • NoSlackDelta

      December 22, 2017 at 9:47 am

      “Combatting SJWs with facts, logic and reason has proven to be pointless.”

      Exactly. And I believe this is a reason that Helicopter Twitter exists.

  4. Steve O

    December 21, 2017 at 10:52 am

    Understanding why liberals so consistently fall for superficial babble-squakle is easier when you realize that the self-perception of superiority is of central importance to their psyche.

    Be it moral superiority, or intellectual superiority, they have deep-seated needs.

  5. Rusty Esq

    December 21, 2017 at 6:45 pm

    The benchmark you need to use is domestic violence. Feminists still refuse to acknowledge there is a single male victim or a single female aggressor.

    This is easily proven by an image search on any search engine. All victims portrayed (and i mean all) are female. Look at government figures and there are significant numbers of male victims (about 30%). US, UK, Australia, Canada… they’re all similar.

    Any movement that endorses violence should be ridiculed. However, other then Cassie Jaye, Christina Hoff Sommers (the Factual Feminist) and Rusty Esq, who else takes one of the most disgusting modern attitudes and publicly challenges it? Ok, the website Quillette does too.

    This is how you take down progressives / SJWs / feminists. Point out the worst behaviour.

    Re: only those that don’t care will fight back.
    People can call me whatever they like. I don’t give a damn because I’ve been desensitised by an extremely sexist and racist mainstream media for the last decade. When Ars Technica started its identity politics, my favourite website capitulated to racism and sexism. When you’re backed in a corner by every media outlet who has become racist and sexist, you either crawl into a hole or you come out swinging. I’ve come out swinging.

    From the recent Milo visit, it looks like many other Australians have had enough too.

    However, I will oppose all sexism and racism. Always did and always will. That’s why the last decade has been such a shock as to how racist and sexist society has become.

  6. https://logmein.site

    December 28, 2017 at 10:27 am

    Today, I went to the beachfront with my children. I found a sea shell and gave
    it to my 4 year old daughter and said “You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear.” She placed the shell to her ear and screamed.

    There was a hermit crab inside and it pinched her ear.

    She never wants to go back! LoL I know this is completely off topic but I had to
    tell someone!

  7. happy new year status

    December 29, 2017 at 4:00 am

    Valuable information. Lucky me I discovered your web site by chance, and I’m surprised why this coincidence
    didn’t took place earlier! I bookmarked it.

  8. free music downloads

    February 4, 2018 at 4:20 pm

    “Have you ever thought about adding a little bit more than just your articles? I mean, what you say is important and all. But think of if you added some great pictures or videos to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with images and clips, this blog could undeniably be one of the most beneficial in its field. Very good blog!”

  9. dicks towing

    February 11, 2018 at 7:48 pm

    When some one searches for his vital thing, thus he/she wishes to be available that in detail, therefore that thing is maintained
    over here.

  10. GPU Mining

    February 18, 2018 at 4:53 pm

    I am just starting to learn about all of this. Thanks!

  11. daylight

    February 20, 2018 at 3:54 am

    Hi my loved one! I want to say that thiѕ post
    is amazing, nice written and include approximately аll significant infos.
    I would like to pеer more posts like this .


    March 4, 2018 at 10:12 am

    Well I like what you said,As a junior i want some suggestion. Check my video.Thanks http://ceesty.com/wmofVm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top