Court, Frustrated at Antifa Felarca’s “Attorney’s Games”, Drops Groundless Restraining Order

Tory Worden’s attorney said Felarca’s accusation “only occurred in one place in this universe, her head and in the heads of her fellow conspirators.”

A California court has dismissed an Antifa leader’s temporary restraining order against University of California-Berkeley College Republicans president Troy Worden.

Yvette Felarca, a prominent figure in the Antifa movement, accused the College Republicans of stalking, harassment, and intimidation while securing the restraining order. Felarca has been arrested twice this year and was recently charged with “battery and resisting arrest” during a September 2017 “Victory March” march in Berkeley.

Worden’s attorney argued there is no evidence to support Felarca’s accusation.

“We got video evidence showing that the things that she said happened did not happen,” the attorney continued, referring to Felarca’s accusations. “The evidence is going to be, hopefully, very clear that the whole reason why she brought this is because she was trying to shut down the free speech rights of the Berkeley College Republicans.”

According to Worden’s attorney, the court dismissed the restraining order after learning that the activist “tried to further circumvent California law by obtaining an extension to the temporary restraining order without notifying the court.”

“Today I appeared before the Court and argued that the restraining order needed to be terminated,” attorney Mark Meuser told Campus Reform. “The Court said that they were not notified of Felarca’s out of state attorney’s games and quickly granted the motion.“

Despite the ruling, Felarca is still attempting to secure a permanent restraining order against Worden in the near future.

“We are looking forward to presenting evidence before the court that the facts contained in Felarca’s sworn statement only occurred in one place in this universe, her head and in the heads of her fellow conspirators—other By Any Means Necessary national leaders,” the attorney argued.

Meuser said the temporary restraining order was served shortly after members of the College Republicans attempted to attend a secret BAMN meeting where plans were being made to disrupt an event that the College Republicans were hosting.

“Felarca tried to use university resources to have a secret meeting to shut down the Shapiro event,” Meuser explained.

“The College Republicans decided to not be intimidated and By Any Means Necessary attempted to use force to block the College Republicans,” he continued. “When the college police informed By Any Means Necessary that they were violating school policy Troy was soon thereafter served with a temporary restraining order.”


Campus Reform

Feature Image via



  1. @Menace

    October 16, 2017 at 5:39 am

    Once again we see why they are called BAMN, no lie is too big, no assault is too small. They are domestic terrorists, and should be felt with.

    • Keith Benedict

      October 16, 2017 at 1:21 pm

      Exactly…and then they’ll really find out what BAMN means.

  2. webkilla

    October 16, 2017 at 6:27 am

    so… after the trial they can change their name to BTFO

  3. chrisnj

    October 16, 2017 at 10:09 am

    Leftism is a mental disease. Its leaders may be crafty, but it’s followers display the insanity and irrationality of a cult.

    • claudiusxiii

      October 16, 2017 at 10:51 am

      True, leftism is more a personality type than an ideology or religion.

    • ntt1

      October 16, 2017 at 1:15 pm

      falarca is beyond crafty she is just plain evil.

  4. GigiAnn

    October 16, 2017 at 1:12 pm

    Felarca…A Face a Mother can’t even love.

  5. Ohshutup

    October 16, 2017 at 1:32 pm

    That is one ugly broad

  6. Bert Mc

    October 16, 2017 at 1:36 pm

    the asshole thought she is in a 3rd world country!

  7. Typical

    October 16, 2017 at 1:50 pm

    HE won’t be able to get to her after she’s in jail for assault, so, no PFA will be necessary.

  8. laurie66bay

    October 16, 2017 at 2:02 pm

    Its horrifying that the state of California allows her to go into a classroom with children.

  9. Jesse James

    October 16, 2017 at 2:36 pm

    Some won’t see how dangerous this is, and how it is a forecast of the political weather to come if the likes of Felarca rule with real power! If she had succeeded, every time the college GOPees started a rally, the Donkey-D’s who own Felarca could order her to just “show up” accidently like Paully Perrette did to her ex a few years ago. Thereby guaranteeing that anytime someone who they disagree with politically does, or says, anything they hate…they go to prison.

    California is well known for it’s abuse of restraining orders for celebrities. They must have surmised that Felarca is a legitimate threat to their financial interests in illegally exploiting the constitutional rights of their normal targets. If they let Felarca in that way, it would open the flood gates of public perception about their usual activities against the normal non-custodial father, or financial shakedown of a lower level celebrity.

    Trying times indeed. And the overwhelming percentage of our democracy’s population has no freaking idea, nor care, what their individual, and federal, republics are actually up to. Too much porn to watch I’m sure. They won’t see it coming until the BAMN Staci show up with orders to bury them in an unmarked grave in Alaska.

  10. aVet

    October 16, 2017 at 2:48 pm

    looks like all ANTIFA women are fugly as hell……

    • Greg Brookshire

      October 16, 2017 at 3:56 pm

      and almost a see thru whiteness……get some sun ladies

  11. ogregunner

    October 16, 2017 at 2:54 pm

    Why is this woman free?

  12. William Anderson

    October 16, 2017 at 6:28 pm

    Those statements used to support the restraining order were made under oath…. If they can be shown to be false, then perjury should be considered by the prosecutors. Unfortunately, those elected prosecutors may put politics above the desire to enforce the law.

    Additionally (and without the need of the prosecutor’s assistance…), this GOP fella could file a civil suit against this nutter under at least two civil theories: 1) defamation and 2) abuse of process. Civil damages can be obtained for both claims. The claims could be brought against both this nutter AND the ANTIFA and the By Any Means Necessary group itself.

    If such a suit is brought, then the 2 groups can be subjected to discovery. Every email this woman has sent could be open to scrutiny. Every Facebook post could be obtained, including those in private groups.

    AND, very importantly…. if conspiracy to commit fraud can be shown, and if the conduct crossed state lines, the the RICO statute could be implicated, which would allow the pursuit of anyone who helped fund the fraudulent enterprise…. including SOROS (if he gave even a nickel….).

    And, the interaction between these groups and the university could be investigated in discovery. Even the interaction between the university administration and the police and the mayor. It all can become an open book if discovery is used effectively.

    Discovery is a powerful tool that the conservative groups are simply not using to uncover those who are paying for these crimes to be committed. There are legitimate legal claims that can be pursued – AND SHOULD BE!

    I have said this dozens of times on Milo posts, and I will say it yet again…. SUE THEM!!!

    Generally, the law is intended to act as a shield against tortious conduct. Usually, the mere threat of a lawsuit causes people to respect the rights of others. People don’t cross land with “do not trespass” signs because they do not want to be sued. BUT, when a party ignores the shield and tries to come at you by defaming you or assaulting you or attempting to abuse the courts to harm you, then it is time to turn the law into a sword. The law can be used to uncover who is paying for these asshats to do what they do. So, forgive the repetition…. SUE THEM!!! SUE THEM!!! SUE THEM!!!

    Did I mention that you should SUE THEM!

    Oh, by the way, you should SUE THEM!


    Uh… have I made my point?

    Seriously, it may seem a bit sophomoric to encourage a party to sue to protect that person’s rights, especially in such a public forum, and especially in this sardonic if not sarcastic manner, but there comes a point when enough is enough. If you do not take a stand and force these people to account for and PAY for their conduct, then they will continue to behave this way. Worse, they will become more brazen.

    Consider Weinstein….. If Ashley Judd and Angelina Jolie had come forward and publicly brought the issue to the attention of the people was back when it happened to them, then consider all of the other actresses that came after them who could have been spared the assaults if only the public could have reacted then in the way it has now. Taking a stand early protects those who might become future victims.

    So, I ask these conservative groups and students who are being attacked by these leftist loonies….

    If you don’t, who will?

    Use discovery to empty out the can of worms onto the table for all to see. Let the sunlight shine down on these worms and watch them wiggle and struggle to find a dark hole to crawl back into.

  13. Masmani

    October 16, 2017 at 6:42 pm

    This female mutt should be under the jail!

  14. PaulMurrayCbr

    October 16, 2017 at 7:09 pm

    SLAAP lawsuit!

  15. Pat Patrix

    October 16, 2017 at 10:01 pm

    Just lock this woman up already. Who gets to go around repeatedly assaulting people, ON VIDEO, only to continue being released time and time again. Put her in prison and let her experience some real oppression.

    And rape.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top