UC Berkeley to use $2.7 Million in Student Fees for Gender-Neutral Locker Rooms

Student fees are funding new gender-neutral locker rooms at UC Berkeley which will reportedly cost $2.7 Million…

Just when you thought UC Berkeley couldn’t get any worse, they ask you to “hold their beer” while they construct a large, costly “gender-neutral” locker room. The 4,500 square foot $2.7 Million facility is the first of its kind in the California University system and Berkeley seems to enjoy bragging about it. Several departments were involved in the decision and they were all proud to boast that they were bringing “inclusivity and wellness” to all.

This is just the latest in gender-neutral hysteria. Miley Cyrus reportedly introduced herself as gender neutral as well as booze and drug free. MTV gave a brand new award to Emma Watson this year which was gender neutral. Piers Morgan himself pointed out the fatal flaw of not offering men and women separate awards. We have Campus Reform to thank for bringing another gender-neutral fiasco to light – this time at Berkeley.

This isn’t the first time Campus Reform has brought our attention to unbelievable stunts from the left perpetrated on college campuses. Campus Reform even reported that flyers at a college campus called Trump’s MAGA slogan “coded neo-nazi language.” Campus Reform also reported on the fact that University of Colorado announced they would create black-only student housing. Now, Campus Reform has blown the whistle on Berkeley using millions of student fees to fund a gender-neutral locker room.

Berkeley released a statement bragging about the size and scope of the project:

UC Berkeley administration has approved Recreational Sports’ proposal to renovate existing locker rooms at the Recreational Sports Facility (RSF) – the primary fitness and recreation center on the UC Berkeley campus – to include a new 4,500 square foot gender-inclusive locker room. Construction on this forward-thinking project, the first of its size and scope in the UC system, is expected to begin in Spring 2018.

What good is a gender-neutral locker room if they don’t have their own gender-neutral entryway to the pool?

Not only will the locker room offer private changing rooms, showers, lockers and bathrooms stalls, it will also serve as a non-gendered access point to the Spieker Pool lap swim facility.

Associated Students of University California President Will Morrow took the opportunity to virtue signal about inclusiveness…

“This locker room project not only symbolically affirms our campus values of inclusivity and access for all, but it provides a tangible service for students who are currently being underserved. At the core of this project is a commitment to student holistic wellness—physical, mental, and emotional. In providing a safe and inclusive changing space, the RSF is adapting to better serve the wellness of all members of our campus community,” Will said.

“The RSF is a service for all students, so it was imperative to me that students leaders work collaboratively with Rec Sports administration in making this accessible locker room project a reality. The fact that students voted to use their own student fees to go toward this project exemplifies this spirit of cooperation, and commitment to inclusivity for everyone.”

According to The Daily Californian, the project will have an estimated cost of $2.7 million…

The Capital Projects Committee — a campus administrative committee —  approved the project last month, Durst said. According to Berkeley Rec Sports senior associate director Trineice Durst, the project is estimated to cost $2.7 million, funded entirely by the Wellness Initiative Fee, a student fee aimed at providing funds for health programs at UC Berkeley.

Listen to MILO explain why we should abolish Gender Studies in all publicly funded Universities:


Campus Reform


The Daily Californian




  1. Monsieur de Comte Beaujangles

    May 19, 2017 at 3:19 pm

    They’re paying $2.7 Million for basically a room with toilets in it?

    • NoTreading

      May 19, 2017 at 3:35 pm

      Come on, you know how this works. Maybe half a mil will go to new toilets. The rest goes to a slush fund.

  2. Jonathan David Farley

    May 19, 2017 at 3:34 pm

    The don’t explain why they need private showers if it’s fine for people of different sexes to share a lavatory.

    • bobbert

      May 19, 2017 at 4:21 pm

      because that might make women uncomfortable. keep in mind that when they say that they dislike binary gender, its just men. When they say that binary gender is oppressive, its because men. This is just another move to undermine the existence of men.

  3. Christopher Harding

    May 19, 2017 at 4:06 pm

    dumbest shit ever

  4. Dante Alighieri

    May 19, 2017 at 4:33 pm

    How many Trans students are there at Berkeley? This seems insanely expensive.

  5. Bud359

    May 19, 2017 at 5:21 pm

    The third rape that occurs in said bathroom will mean a $$$very costly$$$ lawsuit to Berkley

    • Pat Patrix

      May 20, 2017 at 3:54 am

      Just wait for the first case of a transman raping a transwoman by forcing her penis into his vagina.

  6. Bunnycakes

    May 20, 2017 at 12:48 am

    This is such bs. They have gender neutral bathrooms which i get but most people go up the extra floor or two just to avoid it because it’s such a politically bs move. I’m so sick of Berkeley hating on white males. The people who feed into this stuff at Berkeley tend to be over privileged rich kids who need to draw attention away from their grades so they make up problems. Think I’m lying? Look up hoyt co-op, an all female co-op at Berkeley, which kicked out an asylumed trans gendered woman because she made them feel uncomfortable. They have no values. They just want to bitch and look for attention.

  7. Pat Patrix

    May 20, 2017 at 3:53 am

    Wouldn’t want anyone to see their feminine penis or masculine vagina.

  8. Andrew Charlton

    May 20, 2017 at 7:59 am

    And people wonder why college is so expensive these days.

  9. Shaune Scott

    May 20, 2017 at 12:13 pm

    So this means that biological men will STAY THE HELL OUT of real women’s private spaces, RIGHT???

    • I_h8_disqus

      May 21, 2017 at 1:46 am

      No. Trans-women don’t want separate but equal. They want to be recognized as women. They will use the women’s lockers. The only ones using the new lockers will be women and normal men who want the extra privacy.

      • Shaune Scott

        May 21, 2017 at 11:49 am

        They are not women. No amount of fantasy or delusion will make them so.

  10. I_h8_disqus

    May 21, 2017 at 1:53 am

    Poor feminists losing to the patriarchy again. Now men have three locker rooms. All guys have the men’s locker. Shy guys have the non-gender locker. Guys who dress like women have the women’s locker. Berkeley didn’t think this through. Transwomen don’t want to be thought of as anything but women. They are not going to use the gender free lockers, because it will tell those around that they aren’t women. Transwomen will use the women’s lockers.

  11. Robin Anderson

    May 21, 2017 at 1:37 pm

    At least there’s a better way to identify these pathetic snowflakes. Someone should figure out a way to provide a list. As a business owner, I’d love a quicker way to weed out the useless candidates.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top